CREATIVITY -(THOUGHT EXPERIMENT)II PART ANSWER TO OBSCURE

NOW SUPPOSE I AM ON A POINT A IN SPACE AND I DECIDE TO SEPARATE FROM MY BODY AND GIVE MY BODY AN APPOINTMENT ON POINT B IN SPACE ( FORGET KNOWN PLACES LIKE SQUARES, CITIES ETC, JUST A POINT B IN SPACE). SUPPOSE FURTHERMORE THAT BOTH THE MIND AND THE BODY ARE ENDOWED WITH A GADGET THAT MEASURES THE TIME EACH EVENT HAS TAKEN TO OCCUR SO THAT FOR INSTANCE IN THE FINAL SUM OF ALL THE MEASUREMENTS IT ADDS DAY BY DAY ( 15 MINUTES SHOWER, 10 MINUTES BREAKFAST AND SO ON) COVER THE ENTIRE LIFE SPAN. UP TO THE MOMENT I HAVE DECIDED TO SEPARATE FROM MY BODY THE TWO MEASUREMENTS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME, THE SAME TIME REGISTRED FOR EACH SEGMENT OF EVENTS OF OUR LIFE AND THE SAME FINAL AMMOUNT. . BUT NOW SOMETHING CHANGES. I TRAVEL AT 500 MILES POR HOUR AND THE BODY ONLY AT 100 TO THE EXTENT THAT WHEN WE JOIN TOGETHER AGAIN AT POINT B THE BODY AND THE MIND GADGETS HAVE TOW DIFFERENT TIMES : THE BODY IS 45 MINUTES OLDER THAN THE MIND! THESE SIMLPE MODEST EXAMPLE OF MINE INEXTRICABLY CONNECTS SPACE AND TIME AND MAKE OUT OF THEM ONE UNIQUE FABRIC , THE SPACE-TIME THING. A FANTASY LIKE THIS COULD HAVE WELL TRIGGERED THE IDEA OF GENERAL RELATIVITY IN A MIND MORE EQUIPPED THAN MINE FOR PHYSICS LIKE EINSTEIN’S ,WHO, ACCORDING TO HISTORY CHANEL (LOL)CONCEIVED OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY WHILE ON A BUS TAKING HIM FROM HOME TO THE WORKING PLACE PASSING FOR A SQUARE WHERE HE USED TO SEE A CLOCK; IN THAT VERY MOMENT HE IMMAGINED WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED TO HIM IF HE TRAVELED AT THE SPEED LIGHT. EINSTEIN NEVER EXPERIMENTED ANYTHING AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE TO HIS GENERAL RELATIVITY CAME MUCH LATER THAN HIS PAPERS WERE PUBLISHED AND AFTER WINNING THE NOBEL PRIZE !!! MANY SCIENTIFIC IDEAS ARE BORN AND VALUED ACCORDING TO THEIR EXPLANATORY POWER AND NOT ANY EVIDENCE THAT MAY OR MAY NOT COME LATER. TAKE FOR INSTANCE THOERIES ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE. WHAT KIND OF EVIDENCE YOU MAY EVER EXPECT TO COME FROM YOUR IDEAS? UNLESS YOU CAN CREATE A UNIVERSE AND SHOW HOW IT STARTED, YOU MUST RELY UPON COMPATIBILITY OF YOUR IDEA WITH THE CURRENT THEORIES AND THERE WILL ALWAYS BE ALTERNATIVE THEORIES WITH THE SAME EXPLANATORY POWER CONSISTENT WITH THE ACTUAL THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE. I HAVE HEARD YOU TO CLAIM WITH AUTORITY THAT TALKING ABOUT GOD, AN ENTITY OUTSIDE SPACE AND TIME IS MEANINGLESS. YET IF YOU ASK A SUPPORTER OF THE BIG BANG THEORY, ‘WHAT WAS IT THERE BEFORE THE BIG BANG?” YOU GET THE SAME ANSWER: BEFORE THE BIG BANG THERE WAS NO TIME OR SPACE THEREFORE YOUR QUESTION IS IDLE. AND YET THEY TALK ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE! NEITHER YOU NOR ANYBODY HOWEVER, CAN STOP THE MIND FROM ASKING QUESTIONS LIKE THE ONE JUST MENTIONED, AND YOU MAY POSIT GOD IF YOU NECESSARELY NEED A N ANSWER FOR YOUR PEACE OF MIND OR YOU CAN STOP RIGHT THERE. SO SCIENCE AND RELIGION HAVE SOME KIND OF COMMON PATH IF AT THE END YOU CAN ASK QUESTIONS TO WHICH YOU GET THE SAME ANSWER. BE CAREFUL, I AM NOT DEFENDING RELIGION, I AM SIMPLY TRYING TO SET THE SCIENTIFC IDEA WITHIN A LESS RELIGEOUS FRAMEWORK, YOU SEEM TO BELIEVE IN SCIENCE WITHOUT KNOWING MUCH ABOUT IT, JUST AS RELIGEOUS PEOPLE BELIEVE IN GOD WITHOUT KNOWING MUCH ABOUT IT.