MORE ANSWERS TO OBSCURE

I don't see any reason why an individual couldn't be aware of the difference between a moving car and the ground. LOL OBSCURE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT NEWTONIAN PHYSICS: ONE OF THE CLAIMS OF IT IS THAT GIVEN TWO THINGS MOVING OR ONE STAYING STILL AND OTHER MOVING YOU MAY SAY WHICH ONE IS MOVING AND THE OTHER IS STATIONARY, OR BOTH MOVING AT DIFFERENT SPEED ONLY REFERRED TO A THIRD OBEJCT THAT WORKS AS A REFERENTIAL FRAMEWORK . NOW DO YOU SEE THE CHILD REASONING IN NEWTONIAN TERMS? ( OK HE SAYS TO HIMSELF, I AM MOVING BECAUSE I SEE THE GROUND REMAINING BACK INCLUDING THE TRAIN STATION AND OTHER TRAINS!!!) IN ORDER TO KNOW ALL THIS HE HAS TRAIN STATIONS BUILT IN IN HIS BRAIN/ MIND, INNATE KNOWLEDGE. NOT EVEN PLATO WOULD BE SO INNATIST!!! He may not have words to really understand what those things are but using his senses (in this particular case his sight and his hearing) he would be in some way aware of a phenomenon going on. I've heard you also say a number of times that a baby only begins separating himself from the rest of the world when he begins to use language. Again, while I agree this is true to an extent I don't see why it is to the extreme you're claiming. A child may not be able to distinguish an object from another (altough I'm not even sure of that; it seems to me like a young child depending on how developed his senses are would instinctively perceive things like space or the difference between a moving car and a tree..even if he thinks they're all aspects of the same thing, he is aware of a difference between the two before he is able to name it) OUR ABILITY TO PREDICATE SAMENESS OF AN OBJECT AND DISTINGUISH IT FROM OTHERS DEPENDS ON THE APPARATUS OF REIFICATION WHICH INCLUDES WORDS : THIS, THAT, IT IS THE SAME, IT IS DIFFERENT AND SO ON... HOW DOES THE BABY KNOW THAT THE TREE HE SEES IN THE YARD IS THE SAME EVERY DAY? THE SUN IS THE SAME SUN EVERY DAY IN THE SKY, AND THE MILK HE DRINKS IS A DIFFERENT QUANTITY EVERY DAY? THINK ABOUT IT !!! HAVING LEArNED A LANGUAGE AND THrOUGH IT A LOT ABOUT THE WORLD YOU LIVE IN ,YOU REASON RETROACTEVeLY ATTRIBUTING TO THE CHILD THINGS SHE CANNOT KNOW YET. THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THAT PERIOD IS A VERY DIFFICULT JOB, WE DO NOT HAVE THE LANGUAGE TO EVEN EXPRESS THIS ANTE LITTERAM KNOWLEDGE. SEE ALSO NATURLIZED EPISTEMOLOGY, IS THE NAME THAT USUALLY IS GIVEN TO A NATURAL APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE