Se siamo stati creati da Dio perche doveva passare per i dinosauri e le scimmie?

Creation–evolution controversy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Part of a series on Creationism History of creationismNeo-creationism Types of creationism Young Earth creationismOld Earth creationismDay-Age creationismProgressive creationismGap creationismIntelligent design Creation theology Creation in GenesisGenesis as an allegoryFramework interpretation Omphalos hypothesis Creation science BaraminologyFlood geologyIntelligent design Controversy Politics of creationismPublic educationHistoryTeach the Controversy Other religious views Hindu · Islamic · JewishDeist · Pandeist Creationism Portal · v • d • e Part of the Biology series on Evolution Mechanisms and processes AdaptationGenetic driftGene flowMutationNatural selectionSpeciation Research and history IntroductionEvidenceEvolutionary history of lifeHistoryModern synthesisSocial effectTheory and factObjections / Controversy Evolutionary biology fields CladisticsEcological geneticsEvolutionary developmentHuman evolutionMolecular evolutionPhylogeneticsPopulation genetics Biology portal · v • d • e The creation–evolution controversy (also termed the creation vs. evolution debate or the origins debate) is a recurring theological and cultural-political dispute about the origins of the Earth, humanity, life, and the universe,[1] between those who espouse the validity and/or superiority of literal interpretations of a creation myth, and the proponents of evolution, backed by scientific consensus. The dispute particularly involves the field of evolutionary biology, but also the fields of geology, palaeontology, thermodynamics, nuclear physics and cosmology.[2] This debate is most prevalent in the United States, but also exists in Europe and elsewhere.[3] It is often portrayed as part of the culture wars.[4] While the controversy has a long history,[5] today it is mainly over what constitutes good science,[6] with the politics of creationism primarily focusing on the teaching of creation and evolution in public education.[7] The debate also focuses on issues such as the definition of science (and of what constitutes scientific research and evidence), science education (and whether the teaching of the scientific consensus view should be 'balanced' by also teaching fringe theories), free speech, separation of Church and State, and theology (particularly how different Christians and Christian denominations interpret the Book of Genesis). Within the scientific community and academia the level of support for evolution is essentially universal,[8] while support for biblically-literal accounts or other creationist alternatives is very small among scientists, and virtually nonexistent among those in the relevant fields.[9] The debate is sometimes portrayed as being between science and religion. However, as the National Academy of Sciences states: “ Today, many religious denominations accept that biological evolution has produced the diversity of living things over billions of years of Earth’s history. Many have issued statements observing that evolution and the tenets of their faiths are compatible. Scientists and theologians have written eloquently about their awe and wonder at the history of the universe and of life on this planet, explaining that they see no conflict between their faith in God and the evidence for evolution. Religious denominations that do not accept the occurrence of evolution tend to be those that believe in strictly literal interpretations of religious texts.