They got a point ....

For organic life to exist, the fundamental regularities and constants of physics - the speed of light , the gravitational constant, the strength of the weak and strong nuclear forces, must all have value that fall into an extremely narrow range. The probabilities of this perfect calibration happening is so tiny as to be statistically negligible. Stephen Hawking concludes: " The odds against a universe like ours emerging from something like the Big Bang are enormous. I think there are clearly religious implications". This known as 'The fine Tuning Argument" or also " The Anthropic principle" is embarrassing to many atheists like Dawkins and other and their answer to it forces them into a metaphysical hypothesis not better than the God Creator hypothesis : " then - they say - there might be billions or trillions of universes ", the more they are the less improbable is that one or two have reached this calibration by chance. A multitude of universes is not verifiable as god's existence. Better arguments are : 1) Why regularities are more impressive than irregularities? The former are object of knowledge. the latter are not, so there can be an overwhelming amount of irregularities that are at odds with knowledge and they function as obstacles to knowledge of the kind we can grasp: our mind works on generalizations, homological reductions, and unifications of different branches of knowledge. It could well be that within one universe the irregular properties are overwhelmingly more than the regularities but they eschew nomological treatment by definition. 2) Regularities may be fictions of the mind, reduction of similarities to identities and so on. 3) Last but not the least if God emerges from the improbabilities of a suspiciously harmonious universe, God himself, by the same token emerges as a very improbably unique being. The conclusion is that there must be billions if not trillions of Gods in order to have one so perfect and smart to create such intelligent universe!!!!